You are currently viewing Nerds manufacturer says THC-infused candies violate trademark rights

Nerds manufacturer says THC-infused candies violate trademark rights


Reuters..

(Reuters) – Ferrara Candy Co sued a company in Florida federal court on Monday for allegedly copying the branding of its Nerds and Trolli candies with weed-infused edibles.

Boca Raton, Florida-based Top Five Wholesale’s THC candies use identical trademarks to Ferrara’s and will likely cause consumer confusion, Ferrara’s lawsuit said.

Top Five did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the lawsuit. Ferrara said in a statement that it works to prevent THC-infused copycats by cooperating with law enforcement, investigating dispensaries and taking legal action “where and when necessary.”

Ferrara and other candy companies including Hershey Co and Mars Inc’s Wrigley have filed several lawsuits over marijuana-infused lookalike products. Two other companies agreed to a court order that blocks them from selling Nerds-branded edibles earlier this year after they were sued by Ferrara in Chicago.

Ferrara’s Monday lawsuit, filed in West Palm Beach, said Top Five sells counterfeit THC-infused Nerds Ropes and Trolli gummy candies. Ferrara distributes Germany-based Trolli GmbH’s candies in the United States.

The lawsuit also said Top Five’s candies have “more than 60 adult servings” of THC, creating “a health hazard to the consuming public, especially children.”

Ferrara also said the sale of recreational marijuana is illegal in Florida.

The company asked the court to block sales of the edibles and make Top Five destroy the allegedly infringing products, and requested damages of $2 million per counterfeited trademark.

The case is Ferrara Candy Co v. Akimov LLC d/b/a Top Five Wholesale, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, No. 9:22-cv-80768.

Read full article at 

https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/nerds-maker-says-thc-infused-candies-violate-trademark-rights-endanger-kids-2022-05-23/

 

For those of you with a Lexis account see

https://www.law360.com/cases/628b8be066f64f018073ce96?article_sidebar=1